The phrase "Liminal zones" wormed its way into my head from the foggy, thirty six year old, depths of Honours Anthropology, and whether it stretches to cover what I mean will become apparent, or not. But first, a digression, because Life is full of digressions, and because this blog is a genuine attempt to document the (r)evolution and remaking of a (new) Life that is the lot of this Baby Boomer in Retirement. Jelly moulds. Knitting. Literary reflections. Ceramics. It's all grist for this Magpie's Nest.
It's 5.47 am Eastern Standard Time, black outside, with sounds of the cars of early morning workers winding down the road out front, and the dawn chorus twittering away. Let's hope that at least the magpies are sensibly tucked up in their little downy nests. My husband certainly is, slightly bemused but supportive of the necessity of me giving in to this aberarrant behaviour. And it's chilly here in this room of my own - propping my heavy head on ice cold hands is not pleasant - conducive to clear thought, yes. At 4 am when I gave up sleep to cater to the needs of a vastly overstimulated brain, I was thankful that retirement supports such glitches in routine. I can go back to bed when this is done. I have a number of projects on the boil, and book blogging is one.
Actively pursuing 'Middle-aged Happiness Rule No 1-"Keep on doing what you've always loved - that which is guaranteed to give you exquisite moments of joy, and the odd insight' (yes, of course I just made that rule up, but you get it don't you?), I've been making far more time for concentrated periods of daily reading in my life. Not the women's magazine variety reading under the hairdresser's scissors, where I see that Prince Harry is hiding his disappointment at Pippa's engagement under his Wild Child facade. The kind where I have to finish Geraldine Brooks' latest novel before this Friday's book group, or I'm going to look like a fool. Again.
I've been very impressed by the novels of Geraldine Brooks: think 'Caleb's Crossing', think 'People of the Book', think 'March', think 'Year of Wonders:A Novel of the Plague'. And the insight that I've had (see Rule No 1), is that it's the same reason that I really like the novels of Tracey Chevalier: think 'The Girl with the Pearl Earring', think 'Remarkable Creatures', think 'The Lady and the Unicorn'. In writing their novels, both Brooks and Chevalier rewrite the past, both literally and figuratively, giving marginalised characters a major voice, causing The Reader to empathise with their situation. This approach results in a vindication, re-addressing the wrongs of the past by giving the characters powerful voices, allowing a contemporary audience to appreciate their plight(s) more deeply. It's the kind of historical righting writing that I find deeply appeals, more so because it's usually the marginalised female voice that is privileged by these writers, especially so when the 'hero' of the historical period is ostensibly a prominent male painter, scientist, academic etc. In this way, the female wins when she didn't have a hope in Hades in the distant past.
For both writers, female literacy and equality is a strong underlying theme. Chevalier's reworking of Mary Anning's status is one instance. And for Brooks, whilst 'Caleb's Crossing' is about the access to western literacy by the marginalised indigenous American Caleb, it is more strongly about the lack of access to formal literacy for seventh century Anglo females living in the American colonies.
In 'Caleb's Crossing' the preternaturally wise, female voice of the teenage narrator allows us to appreciate the complex consequences of the lack of a common literacy, and the lack of common values, between settler-invaders and indigeonous people. The lack of a common understanding between indigenous and invader is a familiar theme, but Brooks has manipulated and therefore intensified the perceived injustice by making the two American Indian scholars - Caleb and Joel - far more academically able than their peers, and in western eyes, formal academic prowess is the currency of social advancement.
Injustice is cloaked in a sense of the unfairness of blighting an able person's right to advancement on those merits alone. Under these terms, Bethia the female narrator, and Caleb, the Indian scholar, are both marginalised, denied access to full social rights, and suffer accordingly. The point is well made.
As a former English teacher, I was left with a great deal of empathy for Bethia's brother, Makepeace. I could see that Brooks has manipulated the Reader's sympathies by making Makepeace a glutton, lascivious etc, but his greatest 'sin' in terms of the novel was that he was 'dumb' yet had access to education because of the colour of his skin, and his sex. The academically bright young things, the female Bethia and the Indian Caleb, lacked his 'advantages'. To be born white and male in that society was privilege enough, but to waste it all because you were dumb was the real crime in this novel. In taking a different reading from the book, the teacher in me was left wanting to help and support a deeply unhappy, dyslexic little boy, with no hope of accessing learning support, and therefore finding himself on the margins of male society forever.
That is not to say that I don't love the way that Brooks takes historically interesting gems and reworks them into thought-provoking narratives. It's a genre of historical fiction that I am deeply appreciate of. If all history is a product of the context of the documenter, and I am happy to concur there, then historical fiction of this sort has a valid place in our appreciation for the historical past and the marginalised present.
It is now 7 am EST. The paid worker in the house should be rousing, it's daylight outside, and perhaps I should go for a walk or put the porridge on before snuggling back into bed? Blogging takes every bit as much time as university essays used to - at least the 1,000 word ones - but at least I get to set my own topic. Now that is a kind of Middle-Aged freedom!
PS. Let's add Michael Ondaatje to this list of Justice (W)Righting. His brilliant, multi-layered novel about Toronto, with its focus on an immigrant workforce and a bridge, is called 'In the Skin of a Lion'.
Recent Comments